28 Commentaires

  1. This video is wrong. Although the Male pollen from a true Male plant is more dominant. It is not however dominant against the genetics of a photo period and likewise it is even harder to pick up terpenes. Or purple colors for that matter and that's a fact. They will always be recessive against becoming purple.

  2. You need to inbreed 3 generations to achive 100% auto again after crossing (hybridizing) auto and photo; your seeds will be photo dominant the first generation, so not good advise for making auto flower seeds.

  3. This is bullshit. It takes three generations of crosses to create an autoflower strain from a photo and auto because auto genetic trait is recessive and none of the plants from the first cross will be autoflowering, the auto trait only shows on the second cross and even then only 25% of offspring are auto. This 25% are then crossed again with each other to form the 100% auto strain.

  4. What if we want to make female autoflower seeds?
    For example With Ruderalis pollens if l collected pollen into the freezer then take it with brush do the female (after two weeks pistil grows) twice a day is enough? Thanks for the video because it is really educational

  5. The photo-period gene is dominant. The auto flowering gene is recessive. When you cross the two…..the majority of the first generation of seeds will carry the dominant photo gene. There will be a smaller percentage of seeds that carry the recessive gene…..and those are the ones you are looking for to back cross with another plant carrying the recessive gene. This ensures the next generation of seeds will primarily carry the recessive auto gene.

  6. Can you chemically remove autoflower aspect from a strain without creating a new strain? I believe that autoflower are only created by breeding a regular plant with a ruderalis. If the ruderalis is removed you have 1/2 of the parents. Which would make a new or different strain. Because you cant have an autoflower without the ruderalis being breed into the strain. Is this thought process correct ?

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée.


*